Connect with us


During The Euro 2020 Final Twitter Revealed The Extent Of Bigotry Claiming That Using Real Names Would Not Halt Hate

After the Euro 2020 final, where footballers were subjected to racist abuse, Twitter has disclosed the initial findings and adjustments to come.
It has revealed the broad scope of the problem, as well as its belief that a “real name policy,” which has been frequently touted as a possible solution to misuse, would not be effective in combating it.
Twitter also announced that it will be launching a new “autoblock” tool that would temporarily hide messages from users that use harsh language.
It also implied that accusations that much of the abuse came from outside the country were untrue.
“Although many have rightly emphasized the global aspect of the discourse,” Twitter noted, “it’s also essential to note that the United Kingdom was by far the largest nation of origin for the abusive Tweets we removed.”
In the aftermath of the Euro 2020 final, Twitter stated it had removed more than 1,900 racist and abusive posts.
Twitter says it discovered and removed 1,622 tweets during the final and the 24 hours following the game, with the number growing to 1,961 three days later.
After missing penalties in the shootout at Wembley last month, England players Marcus Rashford, Jadon Sancho, and Bukayo Saka were racially insulted online following their defeat to Italy in the final.
Many others thought that a real-name policy would help ensure that people were held more accountable for what they posted online in the aftermath of the abuse.
However, Twitter stated that 99 percent of banned accounts were already recognizable, and that “ID verification would have been unlikely to prevent the abuse from occurring.”
The social media behemoth agreed that racism is a “deep societal issue” that also exists offline, but admitted that it needs to do more to keep its platform safe, and advocated more collaborative action with government and football authorities.
Before the competition, Twitter stated it has put in place mechanisms to “immediately identify and remove racist, abusive tweets targeting the England team and larger Euros debate,” according to an update on its response to the event.
Only 2% of the tweets removed following the final generated more than 1,000 impressions, or views, before being taken down, according to Twitter. The site and others have been criticized of being sluggish to respond to online abuse and remove it, but Twitter claims that as a result of these efforts, only 2% of the tweets removed following the final generated more than 1,000 impressions, or views, before being taken down.
Facebook stated it was still working on ways to make this type of information less visible so that fewer people saw it before it was removed.
The UK was also “by by” the greatest nation of origin for the nasty tweets on the night of the final and in the days that followed, according to the business.
Several advocates have suggested that ID verification be implemented on social media to reduce the spread of online abuse and assist rapidly identify individuals responsible, but Twitter has claimed that its analysis indicates that this would have been unlikely to prevent the abuse during the Euros.
According to Twitter’s data, 99% of the accounts suspended for violating abuse rules during the tournament were recognizable and were not posting anonymously.
“Our goal is for Twitter to be used as a platform for everyone to communicate safely – whether it’s to highlight injustice or to give a voice to people who have been historically under-represented,” Twitter UK said.
“Racist abuse has no place on Twitter, and we’re committed to doing everything we can to keep these disgusting views and behaviors off our platform.”
“We can do a better job.”
We are well aware of our responsibility to safeguard the safety of the service, not just for football fans, but for all users.
“Yet, we must acknowledge that the advances we will be able to make on our own will be amplified by broader actions.”
“As long as racism persists offline, we’ll see people try to bring these attitudes online – it’s a problem that technology alone can’t solve.”
“Everyone has a responsibility to play – including the government and football authorities – and??we will continue to urge for a collective approach to address this fundamental social issue,” she said. Last week, police probing online racial abuse of England players during the Euro 2020 final made 11 arrests.
The UK Football Police Unit says it has received over 600 reports from individuals, charities, clubs, and other organizations around the country, with 207 of them being illegal in nature and 34 of them being in the UK.
Press Association contributed further reporting.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Must See

More in News